Coal Still the Cheapest Power Source Despite Increases
It seems everything costs more these days. Milk, eggs, gas and even coal – the price of each of these commodities has risen in the last few months.
Petroleum liquids —
$9.21
Natural gas — $7.45
Numbers
like these make it clear that we need to continue to develop carbon capture and
clean coal technologies. Finding better ways to use our most affordable and
abundant fuel source will not only help us keep America running, it will help ease
the costs of doing so.

Thank you for you Rebublicans, for standing up against Pelosi and fighting for a GOOD energy program
Posted by: Maty Hardy | August 07, 2008 at 05:03 PM
Yes it is cheap but if you take the damage it has done and the total cost of using coal then coal and fossil fuels are the most expensive. Imagine, the days when dumping wastewater was almost free...this caused widespread groundwater and surface water pollution. with proper policies in place the cost went up some but LOOK our rivers and beaches are cleaner today and getting better and the cost of water treatment is not too bad! the same needs to be done with energy policy
Posted by: AJ | August 08, 2008 at 01:12 PM
Isn't the sun and wind more abundant than coal?
What ACCCE isn't telling you is that the price of coal in the commodity markets has tripled in the last year -- and since coal is sold on long-term, multi-year contracts, consumers are insulated from these price hikes only until they explode, like subprime adjustable rate mortgages.
Posted by: The Cunctator | August 10, 2008 at 02:15 PM
Your list of fuel is suspiciously missing a key source of heat - commercial nuclear fuel.
Here is a more complete version of your table:
Commercial nuclear fuel - $0.45
Coal - $1.78
Petroleum liquids - $9.21
Natural gas - $7.45
The cost for nuclear fuel includes "the amortized costs associated with the purchasing of uranium, conversion, enrichment, and fabrication services along with storage and shipment costs, and inventory (including interest) charges less any expected salvage value". (Source: Nuclear Energy Institute)
The cost for the carbon based fuels listed does not include any provision for carbon capture and storage.
Now - which is the cheapest fuel of all?
Posted by: Rod Adams | August 17, 2008 at 02:48 PM