Salazar: There is clean coal technology
We are glad that Secretary Salazar realizes that there is more to CCT than the capture and storage of carbon, and share his sentiment that we need to continue to invest in the development of CCS technologies.
He goes on to say that coal is to the United States what oil is to Saudi Arabia, and that President Obama – through the stimulus package – has invested a significant amount of money into finding ways to use coal more cleanly.
It’s great to see America’s leaders voicing their support for CCT, and we look forward to working Secretary Salazar and the rest of the Obama administration in solving the energy puzzle facing America.

There is no such thing as clean coal. And mountain top mining is the worst thing that has ever happened to the South.
Posted by: Gloria Picchetti | April 26, 2009 at 10:46 AM
Gloria Picchetti: Actually, clean coal refers to a whole suite of technologies, each working to produce electricity from coal as efficiently and cleanly as possible.These technologies have helped make today’s coal-based generating fleet 77 percent cleaner than it was in 1970 in terms of emissions currently regulated under existing Clean Air Act programs per unit of energy produced – which include sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide.
Posted by: Monica from ACCCE | April 27, 2009 at 03:01 PM
You have twisted my complaint about coal so that on line it appears as if I approve of the product. I do not approve of the use of coal.
Posted by: Gloria Picchetti | June 07, 2009 at 10:42 PM
Gloria: Coal provides 50% of our electricity. To date, the use of technology has made it possible to produce more electricity from coal to meet our country’s growing energy demand with fewer emissions of pollutants regulated by federal and state clean air laws. And by continuing to invest in technology, we can reduce emissions even further, including the capture and safe storage of CO2.
Posted by: Monica from ACCCE | June 08, 2009 at 05:54 PM
I do not approve of coal. There is no room for this outdated product. Electricity should be made from solar and wind.
Posted by: Gloria Picchetti | June 25, 2009 at 07:17 AM
It does matter how much electriciy is provided by coal. Coal is dirty. Coal is not necessary. Electricity should be created with solar and wind.
Posted by: Gloria Picchetti | June 27, 2009 at 08:17 PM
Corporate America has no shame. You support coal so you made your reply to my post look as if it is a support of dirty, filthy, polluting coal. Coal's days are numbered. Soon all energy will be by solar, wind, and water, enthanol, and hydrogen. You are so slick but it's temporary.
Posted by: Gloria PIcchetti | July 09, 2009 at 08:13 AM
Gloria: When people talk about alternative energy resources, they usually mean solar and wind. These are not replacements for coal. Electricity is produced in base-load power and peaking power. Base-load power is the energy necessary to keep the electricity grid energized and meet a constant demand. Peaking power is energy that comes on and off throughout the day, when electricity usage and energy demand goes up. Peaking power uses intermittent power resources like solar and wind that produce electricity only when there’s sufficient direct sunlight or sufficient sustained wind speed. For base-load power, you must use so-called hard-path fuels such as coal, which can provide power 24 hours per day.
Posted by: Monica from ACCCE | July 09, 2009 at 10:22 AM