Archive for March, 2012

‘This EPA is Fully Engaging in a War on Coal’

That’s what Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) said after the EPA issued new rules regulating greenhouse gas emissions from coal-fueled power plants. Manchin points out that this and other new EPA regulations essentially force utilities to fuel switch, which only harms our economy:

This approach relies totally on cheap natural gas and we’ve seen that bubble burst before. It might sound good now, but what happens if those prices go up? Your average hardworking families and manufacturers will be left holding the bag of uncertainty – either in the prices they pay or in the reliability of our electrical system … This is what happens when this country doesn’t have a true all-of-the-above energy approach. Instead of trying to completely eliminate coal in the long-term, the EPA should be trying to work with industry.

Manchin’s colleague on the other side of the aisle, Sen. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) notes who exactly would be affected by these new regulations:

The last thing we need at this critical stage of economic recovery is to have President Obama pushing more regulations that drive up costs and threaten even more jobs … Our energy focus should be on dealing with our strategic oil vulnerability that contributes to high gasoline prices and weakens our national security … the emissions regulations that the Obama Administration is implementing and other regulations it is considering, will affect every corner of our economy, from big utilities to family farmers, and every Hoosier rate payer.

The experts agree. The Electric Reliability Coordinating Council argues that these new EPA regulations are in direct contrast to President Obama’s rhetoric on energy policy:

[W]e believe that the proposal is short-sighted and marks a real departure from the Administration’s goal of an ‘all of the above’ energy strategy.  The rule would effectively ban the future of almost half of our current electric portfolio … The GHG rule must be placed in the context of many other rules – such as the air toxics rule, the visibility rule, and the interstate rule – that have the effect of increasing the price of energy for consumers by double digits in some areas, and have the effect of making industry less competitive and destroying jobs as each plant closes.

Watch this video to learn more about how new EPA regulations will affect towns across America.


Energy Regulations vs. Reality

Last week, we wrote about the impact new EPA regulations like Utility MACT could have on Avon Lake, Ohio. It’s a small town in the state, but the closing of a generating facility there could potentially cost the community $4 million each year—an 11 percent reduction in the town’s education budget.

Due to shuttering facilities, severe budget cuts are something that communities across the country may soon have to face.

Meanwhile, as the EPA proposes new regulations that could cause coal-fueled plants into early retirement, President Obama continues to tout an “all-of-the-above” energy policy. These regulations threaten the stable, affordable power provided by coal-fueled plants, as well as the jobs of hard working Americans.

See President Obama’s energy ideas contrasted with the reality of towns like Avon Lake in the short video below.

EPA regulations have already caused the announced closure of more than 140 electricity generating units, and the jobs that go with them. Retweet this to your friends:

RT and tell @: New regulations will destroy jobs & drive up energy prices
@AmericasPower
America's Power

New EPA Regulations are the Latest Attempt to Shutter America’s Coal Industry

ACCCE Responds to EPA’s New Source Performance Standards

WASHINGTON – The following statement was released today by the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity President and CEO Steve Miller in response to the EPA’s proposed New Source Performance Standards for greenhouse gas emissions:

“Unfortunately, the EPA continues to ignore the real impact their rules will have on American families and businesses by driving up energy prices and destroying jobs.

“This is another, in a series of new regulations, written by EPA to prevent the U.S. from taking advantage of our vast coal resources that are responsible for providing affordable electricity for America’s families and businesses.   This latest rule will make it impossible to build any new coal-fueled power plants, and could cause the premature closure of many more coal-fueled power plants operating today.

“So far, other EPA regulations are responsible for the announced closure of more than 140 electricity generating units in 19 states.  The regulation EPA proposed today could raise the number of closures even higher and put more workers out of jobs.

“Rarely is there bipartisan agreement in Washington, D.C., but there is on this issue.  This was evident when a bipartisan majority of U.S. House of Representatives recently wrote to President Obama’s Office of Management and Budget urging them to stop this economically-damaging rule.”

Last month, 221 Democrat and Republican Members of the U.S. House of Representatives signed a letter to the White House Office of Management and Budget explaining that new  GHG standards for coal-fueled power plants would force a transition to undeveloped technologies and send thousands of U.S. jobs overseas. To see the full letter, please click here.