When EPA Can Pick and Choose, We All Lose

Posted by Laura Sheehan at 3:08 pm, August 28, 2015

How many times have you watched a sporting event and been convinced the referees officiating the game made calls unfairly favoring one team over another? Just as referees are supposed to call games objectively and without bias, government should stay out of the business of picking winners and losers.

In its final carbon rule, however, the Environmental Protection Agency did just that when it imposed on 22 states more stringent emission reduction requirements than originally proposed.

Final Rule Percentage Map_FINAL_08.28.15

All of these states – except Rhode Island which has no coal-fired electricity generation – rely on coal to maintain affordable electricity prices. The collective average retail electricity price for the 21 coal-reliant “biggest loser” states was 12 percent below the national average in 2014. In contrast, Rhode Island’s electricity price was 49 percent above the national average.

EPA’s picking and choosing amounts to a big loss for consumers in all states forced to reduce CO2 emissions, but it hits the “biggest loser” states especially hard. Rising energy costs and declining family incomes are already straining the budgets of America’s lower- and middle-income families. Households with pre-tax annual incomes below $50,000, representing 48 percent of the nation’s households, already spend 17 percent of their after-tax income on energy costs. Many of these families are forced to make tough choices when their energy bill arrives each month. EPA’s carbon rule makes those decisions that much more difficult.

EPA’s pursuit of its illegal plan follows a dangerous trend of government agencies picking winners and losers in the energy marketplace. No matter where you live, this amounts to the makings of something much worse than just a bad call. When government is allowed to pick and choose, we all lose.

Growing Up With Coal: Hillary Clinton and Coal Country

Posted by China Riddle at 11:09 am, August 26, 2015

President Obama’s tireless pursuit of his climate legacy is well-timed with the 2016 election cycle, especially when it comes to Hillary Clinton and how she is addressing the impact Obama’s carbon regulations will have on coal communities.

During her 2008 run, Clinton proudly touted her loose ties to coal country, emphasizing America’s need for coal and the crucial role clean coal technology will play in our energy future. In the wake of the president’s final carbon plan, however, Clinton now speaks of coal in the “past tense.” Reporters say she is walking a fine line between supporting the interests of voters in coal-producing states and appeasing environmentalists and donors aligned with Obama’s plan.

As someone with strong ties to coal country, I’m not “ready” for Hillary’s pseudo-support of the region and the hard working Americans who live there.

When Clinton expressed her support of President Obama’s carbon regulations, she was no longer walking a fine line – in fact, she crossed it. By promising to defend and build upon the costly and illegal plan, Clinton will place the “everyday Americans” she purports to champion in the crosshairs, raising energy costs and destroying jobs for families in coal communities.

Clinton would do well to cease with her “past tense” rhetoric, as coal currently helps support 700,000 jobs and provides nearly 40 percent of our nation’s electricity. The coal industry is very much a part of America’s present and is key to meeting our growing energy needs in the future, but by supporting the president’s plan, Clinton is turning her back on all of those it employs. Like the President, it’s well past time she prioritizes the families she claims to fight for over the support of elitist environmentalist activists she seeks.

Kelley Earnhardt Miller on Clean Coal Technology

Posted by Kelley Earnhardt Miller at 1:20 pm, August 24, 2015

Throughout my partnership with America’s Power, I’ve had the opportunity to learn about the important role coal plays in producing affordable, reliable electricity. One of the most fascinating topics I’ve encountered along the way is clean coal technology, which refers to a number of advanced tools and controls that help coal-fired power plants generate electricity more cleanly and efficiently than ever before.

Growing up around racing, I’ve witnessed how the industry regularly introduces new safety features and modern technologies, while still keeping the sport an enjoyable experience for fans. The same is true in energy, and the coal industry is leading the way when it comes to innovation. At least 15 next-generation technologies are being used today by America’s coal fleet, and by 2017, the coal industry will have invested $142 billion to reduce emissions.

Like Dale Jr. and Regan, I’m encouraged to know our country is at the forefront of these important clean energy advancements, and that we’re working to ensure America is able to use our most abundant energy resource for generations to come.

Learn more about clean coal technology and check out additional footage from Dale Jr.’s and Regan’s trips to two cutting-edge power plants using clean coal technologies.

Motors and Miners: Our Weekend at Indianapolis Motor Speedway

Posted by China Riddle at 11:02 am, August 18, 2015

The America’s Power team hit Indianapolis Motor Speedway last month to spread the word about coal-based electricity with our partner and driver of the #7 car, Regan Smith. While it’s always a blast to watch Regan race the America’s Power Chevy, some of the day’s best moments happened before the drivers even started their engines.

During a meet-and-greet with Regan’s pit crew, we asked the crowd gathered at the America’s Power booth if anyone had ever been in a coal mine. Among the dozens of hands raised included one belonging to Randy’s wife, who pointed to her husband and said, “He did it for 26 years!”

Now retired, Randy worked as an Indiana coal miner for more than a quarter of a century. The same company that employed Randy also employed his grandfather and cousin, as well as his wife’s grandfather, father and nine uncles. For Randy and countless others across America, coal mining is a proud and rewarding family tradition.

Supporters_Randy Alexander_FINAL_08.13.15

I too come from a proud coal mining heritage and deeply understand the importance of coal to families like Randy’s. Hearing the stories of hard-working Americans reinforces the mission of America’s Power to protect an industry that provides careers for hundreds of thousands, and affordable electricity for our entire nation. As Randy rightfully told us, “It just makes good sense for Americans to use coal.”

Join Randy by sharing how affordable coal-based power helps fuel your life, family and community.

Hold On To Your Piggy Bank If EPA Gets Its Way

Posted by Laura Sheehan at 11:55 am, August 13, 2015

EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy sent a clear message to consumers this month – your piggy bank won’t get in the way of the agency’s illegal pursuit to regulate carbon emissions.

McCarthy claimed that EPA’s carbon emissions rule is “a win all around.”

Really? Setting aside the fact that legislatures, governors and attorneys general representing 32 states have expressed opposition to EPA’s approach, McCarthy’s comments completely ignore the challenges facing the 59 million low- and middle-income Americans who already spend 17 percent of their budget on energy.

Declining real household incomes, coupled with increased energy prices, are burdening family budgets for millions of low- and middle-income Americans. With wages continuing to stagnate, consumers are now facing the shuttering of hundreds of power plants and are expected to do without tens of thousands of megawatts of coal-generated electricity.

EPA’s answer? Force utilities and consumers to accept less reliable sources of electricity. By forcing these rules on the American public, EPA is making energy costs less affordable for our most vulnerable citizens and will ultimately put our economy at risk.

At a time when we have access to safe and reliable coal and our air has never been cleaner, it is tragic that families still have to decide whether they should keep the lights on or put food on the table.

These concerns are not falling on deaf ears. Recent polling conducted for our organization by Morning Consult reveals significant concern by consumers over how attitudes change when respondents are brought up to speed on the expected cost implications of the rule. Specifically, respondents are unlikely to support the rule if it squeezes the middle class, leads to job losses or increases household energy costs. These are the facts Administrator McCarthy would rather not share with the American public.

We expect the consequences of EPA’s carbon regulation will be severe: causing energy prices to soar, disproportionately affecting impoverished communities and using fewer sources of reliable energy. As the rule becomes available to the public, we will continue to report on economic implications of EPA’s regulatory overreach.

We can’t afford to let this expensive, illegal rule go into effect and we hope you will join us in fighting EPA’s latest regulatory overreach.

Committee Report on EPA-NRDC Collusion Raises Eyebrows on Capitol Hill

Posted by Laura Sheehan at 2:59 pm, August 10, 2015

It’s no secret the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Resources Defense Council are joined at the hip on the onerous, carbon regulations being foisted on the American public. It’s been going on for years.

A new Congressional report shows the depths of this cozy relationship.

In its report, the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works reveals how EPA has been colluding with wealthy environmental activists to create these carbon rules, which place the greatest burden on those Americans who can afford it least.

Not only will Americans be left with sky-rocketing electricity prices, they will also be at risk of a weakened electric grid unable to handle massive changes mandated by EPA’s plan. Even worse, the purported health improvements are nothing more than a smoke screen designed to hide the fact that the plan will do nothing to meaningfully reduce global greenhouse gas emissions.

Senate EPW Blog Post_Graphic_FINAL_08.10.15

Here are just a few of the ways EPA and environmental activists attempted to pull the wool over the eyes of Americans:

Wild goose chase: The report cites numerous accounts of EPA officials repeatedly misleading the public, news media and Congress about their negotiations and dealings with environmental activists in order to breathe life into the carbon emissions ruling.

Getting cozy: The report details the “cozy relationship” among EPA officials and environmental activists. To avoid public transparency, they were often communicating through personal email accounts and holding meetings away from EPA headquarters.

According to email records between key EPA and NRDC players, “senior EPA officials continued to have numerous phone calls and meetings in July 2013 with NRDC staff, including several to discuss technical analysis and modeling that NRDC has developed to support its policy proposals.”

Political chess: EPA manipulated rule-making deadlines to avoid public backlash before the 2012 Presidential and 2014 midterm elections. They even went as far as to devise a “sue-and-settle” scheme, where negotiations among EPA and environmental activists were made behind closed doors.

Even more disheartening is the strong-arming of EPA Science Advisory Board members to “back down from review,” in order to block scientific and scholarly input and push the plans into the hands of the president.

The evidence of a carbon rules political cartel is overwhelming. With EPA and environmentalist groups running amok, Congressional oversight is more important than ever.

It’s time the American public knows more about exactly what is going on between EPA and wealthy environmental activists. Spread the word!

EPA Outdoes Itself with Final Carbon Plan, Consumers Pay the Price

Posted by Laura Sheehan at 4:37 pm, August 03, 2015

When it comes to bureaucratic overreach, the Environmental Protection Agency just took the proverbial cake when issuing its final rule regulating carbon dioxide emissions from power plants. In doing so, EPA usurped the authority of virtually every state in the nation, while unleashing both sky-high energy cost increases for consumers and irreversible damage to the reliability of America’s electric grid.

EPA’s final rule is the most expensive ever imposed on the electric power sector. According to analysis of the proposed rule conducted by NERA Economic Consulting, consumers will see double-digit electricity rate increases in 43 states if the plan is implemented. These increases will be particularly devastating for the 59 million low- and middle-income families who may be forced to choose to keep the lights on or food on the table.

How else does the final rule affect America?

  • The nation’s electricity grid will be jeopardized. Nearly 20 percent of the U.S. coal fleet is currently scheduled to retire, largely due to recent EPA policies. Once coal plants go offline, they cannot be brought back online to generate electricity during times of greatest demand. As a result, America’s grid, which is not prepared to operate on renewable energy sources, would require an estimated $2 trillion in upgrades by 2030.
  • Perhaps the biggest blow of all, EPA’s carbon regulations will have virtually no effect on its stated purpose: climate change. At best, the rule will reduce atmospheric CO2 concentrations by less than one-half of one percent, global average temperature by less than 2/100th of a degree and sea level rise by the thickness of three sheets of paper – all at a cost few can afford.

Because EPA deliberately misinterpreted the Clean Air Act, this illegal rule engendered the opposition of elected and environmental officials from 32 states and legal experts. In fact, President Obama’s former law professor, renowned constitutional law scholar Laurence Tribe, likened the regulation to “burning the Constitution.”


Mike Duncan, president and CEO of the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity, said it best today: “This rule fails across the board, but most troubling is that it fails the millions of families and businesses who rely on affordable electricity to help them keep food on the table and the lights on.”

We will continue to fight until this illegal takeover of America’s energy system is overturned by the courts. Stay tuned for updates on how America’s Power is making sure electricity remains affordable for all Americans.

America’s Real Moral Obligation: Protecting Our Most Vulnerable Communities

Posted by Laura Sheehan at 2:17 pm, July 31, 2015

This column originally appeared in The Morning Consult on July 17, 2015.

The Environmental Protection Agency relies on a predictable playbook to bolster public support for its agenda. Using hyperbolic rhetoric to tug at Americans’ heartstrings, the agency routinely fails to disclose important considerations like costs and consequences. Case in point is a recent blog post by EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy calling on our “moral obligation” to support radical climate change initiatives like her agency’s proposed plan to regulate carbon emissions from power plants and efforts to limit fossil fuel development abroad. Not surprisingly, the blog post makes no mention of the negative impacts of these regulations.

While Administrator McCarthy is correct to assert America has a moral obligation to help struggling people around the globe, it is not in the way that she calls for it. Our real moral obligation is to protect vulnerable communities, including hard-working families, businesses and our economy, from EPA’s proposed plan. Overreaching environmental policies, like those her agency is pursuing as part of President Obama’s Climate Action Plan, will lead to a decrease in affordable electricity, adding up to economic hardships for our nation’s most vulnerable communities and for billions of people around the globe.

The climate policies Administrator McCarthy claims we have a moral obligation to support will phase out electricity from fossil fuels, including coal. Considering the fact that coal-based generation alone accounts for nearly 40 percent of our electricity supply in the United States and nearly 41 percent around the world, the costs and consequences are substantial.

American households, particularly those of vulnerable groups like minorities and the elderly, face rising electricity costs and are spending a substantial portion of their incomes just to keep the power on. These households already struggling to make ends meet will see these costs piled on top of the 17 percent of their take-home pay they already spend on energy needs.

Energy poverty is arguably one of the most significant human crises we face. In fact, it is estimated that one in seven people globally lack adequate access to electricity. Far too many families go without the electricity required for basic needs like clean water, safe heating and cooking, and medical equipment. By working to limit fossil fuel use abroad, EPA will prevent developing nations from experiencing the benefits that accompany low-cost, reliable electricity including economic development, the adaption of new technologies and advanced health care.

The climate movement is grasping at straws by attempting to supplant fossil fuels with costlier, less reliable fuel sources like wind and solar. Simply put, these resources cannot replace affordable, dependable fuel sources like coal. Renewables aren’t able to provide around-the-clock power generation because the sun doesn’t always shine and the wind doesn’t always blow. Likewise, EPA and its allies like to ignore the fossil fuel industry’s tremendous advancements in championing clean energy technologies, which are reducing emissions and ensuring these abundant resources can meet ever-growing energy demand in a cleaner and more efficient manner than ever before.

It appears Administrator McCarthy has no intention of scaling back her agency’s climate change initiatives, which are nothing more than a last-ditch legacy-building effort for President Obama. Our real moral obligation is protecting our own community and the communities that need our help most urgently from the serious threats these regulations pose domestically and internationally. To fulfill this moral obligation, we must stand united in fighting EPA’s dangerous agenda.